John Updike By Way of NYTBR 12 May 2013

“America is a vast conspiracy to make you happy.”  –  John Updike

Self pondered this.  She felt like adding, Yeah, spoken like a man with money.  Spoken like a man with a job.

But then she remembered:  This is America!  You don’t need money!  You just need a credit card!  And if you go broke, you can just declare bankruptcy, and then rise, Phoenix-like, from the flames!

She had uncles and aunts who did this all the time.  Repossessed Jaguars and Mercedes Benzes were all over their credit records.  But that never seemed to stop them from getting loans for new Jaguars, new Benzes.

She’ll never forget the saleswoman in the glass store in The Venetian (Las Vegas).  Browsing, self saw the most fabulous amber-colored drop earrings.  She didn’t have enough cash, so she asked the saleswoman, “Do you take Discover?”

“Honey,” the woman said.  “This is Las Vegas.  We take American Express, Mastercard, Visa, Discover, Diner’s Club, check, post-dated check, you name it!”

Sold!

Stay tuned, dear blog readers.  Stay tuned.

Books Mentioned in The New York Times Book Review, 30 September 2012

Isn’t it wonderful how self keeps finding NYTBR issues from last year?

Here’s one that isn’t too long ago:  it’s from September 2012.

In this issue, the “By the Book” interview is With Michael Chabon, who just happens to be reading Moonraker, by Ian Fleming (written 1955).  He also mentions Cloud Atlas, and Ben Marcus (author of The Flame Alphabet) and three of what he thinks are classics of “genre fiction”:  The Turn of the Screw, Heart of Darkness, and Blood Meridian.  Next on his reading list:  Beyond Black, by Hilary Mantel, and Diamonds are Forever.

There is a review of Love Bomb, a novel by Lisa Zeidner, that refers to a previous novel by Ayelet Waldman, Red Hook Road (which self will try and read).

Finally, there is a review by Christian Bauman (who served with the United States Army in Somalia and Haiti) of Fobbit, by David Abrams, a novel whose hero is assigned to a public affairs team in a “Forward Operating Base,” or FOB, in Iraq. (“Dead soldiers,” according to Abrams’ hero, “were now little more than objects to be loaded onto the back of C-130s somewhere and delivered like pizzas to the United States.”)

Interesting.

Stay tuned, dear blog readers.  Stay tuned.

Fiona Maazel’s End Paper Essay in the NYTBR (31 March 2013)

Too tired to do much except quote, this evening.  Bella The Ancient One seems uncommonly hungry.

The excerpt below is from Fiona Maazel’s very interesting essay, “A Crack in the Darkness,” in the NYTBR of 31 March 2013:

That old dictum, write what you know?  I’ve always thought that was terrible advice.  Most of us don’t know much.  And what we do know can feel shopworn in the retelling.  Shopworn or just divested of emotional content.  Sometimes, the things we’re closest to –  in our lives, for instance –  are the very things we least want to examine with rigor.

So I prefer:  Write what you can learn about.  Alternately:  write what interests you.  Because it interests you for a reason, and that reason probably has to do with the rough stuff of your inner life.  Put differently, writing about things you don’t know seems a useful, albeit sneaky, gateway to material you cannot access otherwise.

Stay tuned, dear blog readers.  Stay tuned.

Tra-La, Tra-La, a New NYTBR Post (from Issue 3 March 2013)

The “By the Book” interview is with Garry Wills.  In keeping with his stature as a heavyweight intellectual, his recommended tomes are mostly tremendously serious books, for example:  Through the Eye of a Needle, by Peter Brown; David Balfour, by Robert Louis Stevenson; and The Acts and Monuments, about the upheavals of Reformation England, by John Foxe.

The Fun Parts, a collection of short stories by Sam Lipsyte, endorsed by Currently Famous Short Story Writer Ben Fountain

Schroder, a novel by Amity Gaige (Self realizes she’s already read a chapter of this novel; it was in One Story)

A couple of novels by chick-lit writer Lucinda Rosenfeld, including the just-published The Pretty One:  A Novel About Sisters.  According to reviewer Emily Cooke, “None of the women have the lives they once envisioned, and they won’t let one another forget it.”

Stay tuned, dear blog readers.  Stay tuned.

NYTBR 10 February 2013

Short list, because self has to cook dinner tonight!  Oh, what to do, what to cook, when to start, how much time to devote to standing before stove, etc etc

The cover of this issue of the NYTBR is a review of Karen Russell’s new collection of short stories, Vampires in the Lemon Grove.  Self hates Karen Russell.  She and her publisher always come up with the best titles.  It’s not fair!  Reviewer Joy Williams extols collection to High Heaven.  OK, OK, self will read.

Katherine Boo is interviewed in “By the Book,” and she has recently read the following:

  • Ben Fountain’s Billy Lynn’s Long Halftime Walk (Self will overlook how much she detests that title, simply because, after all  –  well, a recommendation by Katherine Boo.  Self means, come on!)
  • Junot Diaz’s This Is How You Lose Her (Self also has problems with this title, but –  Self!  CUT IT OUT!)
  • Cheryl Strayed’s Wild (Self’s been itching to read this for several months, and not just because of the title)
  • Jeet Thayil’s Narcopolis (What’s this book about, self wonders?  She loves the title)

There are other books, many others, self wants to read, but since she is TOTALLY OUT OF TIME, the last books she will  mention are two by David Shields:  How Literature Saved My Life and Reality Hunger (She likes the titles of both).  The reviewer, Mark O’Connell, declares:  “Shields seems interested in only those things –  works of art, people, ideas –  in which he can see himself.  This, of course, is as much a device for literary self-representation as it is an advanced form of narcissism”  which makes him seem, according to O’Connel, like a “high-functioning solipsist.”  Since self doesn’t have time to look up solipsist, but assumes it’s not a favorable thing, she now really wants to read Shields’ books.

Alas!  Farewell for the next couple of hours, dear blog readers!

Stay tuned.

More for the Reading List: NYTBR 3 February 2012

That date (not today’s date, which is the 19th, but the date of the NYTBR issue) happens to be Dear Departed Dad’s death anniversary.  Oh Dear Departed Dad, don’t think of Second Daughter too unkindly:  all she’s done has been produce a couple of short story collections and one novella!  While perfecting her reading and cooking skills!  Not to mention gardening!

Now to the NYTBR.  Following, a lits of books self is interested in perusing:

  • Two translations of Mo Yan, both by Howard GoldblattSandalwood Death and Pow!  The review is by Ian Buruma, who says of Mo Yan:  “There is nothing mandarin, or even urbane, about Mo Yan’s work.  He has retained the earthy character of rural Shandong, where he grew up in a farming family.”
  • Recommended by humorist Dave Barry:  Doris Kearns Goodwin’s Team of Rivals, The Code of the Woosters (Wodehouse, self presumes), and A Confederacy of Dunces
  • I, Hogarth, by Michael Dean.  Self is a sucker for English biographies, they follow such an arc (usually, slicing through class divisions)
  • Tenth of December:  Stories, by George Saunders.  Self would read anything by George Saunders.  Anything.  Even if the entire book consisted of just one page.
  • The Lady and Her Monsters:  A Tale of Dissections, Real-Life Dr. Frankensteins, and the Creation of Mary Shelley’s Masterpiece, by Roseanne Montillo.  Three reasons to read this book:  (1)  Mary Shelley herself is a masterpiece.  (2)  It’s about science and literature.  (3)  The review by Deborah Blum is so beguiling.
  • Another biography!  Self is absolutely delirious with happiness!  The Pinecone:  The Story of Sarah Losh, Forgotten Romantic Heroine –  Antiquarian, Architect, and Visionary, by Jenny Uglow
  • Another short story collection!  By a writer self has never heard of before!  The News From Spain:  Seven Variations on a Love Story, by Joan Wickersham

And now, self must get dressed to drop off stuff at the post office.

Stay tuned, dear blog readers.  Stay tuned.

After Perusing the NYTBR of 27 January 2013

Whew!  It’s been a while since self perused a New York Times Book Review.  They’re piling up!

But, anyhoo, the sun is shining, the neighbors’ parakeets are trilling, there is such furious activity in gardens all around self’s neighborhood, she doesn’t feel so alone weeding and fertilizing.  Meaning:  It is a great day.

So, here we are at last to the reason for this post:  the books self is interested in reading after perusing a relatively recent issue (Only three Sundays ago!) of the New York Times Book Review, which she keeps thinking about discontinuing, but never actually gets around to.  She renewed for another year in December.

The reason self can blog in the middle of a very busy day is that the list of books self is interested in reading is a very short one.  Why, she has no idea.  But, without further ado, The List:

  • The Inventor and the Tycoon:  A Gilded Age Murder and the Birth of Moving Pictures, by Edward Ball. Congratulations to Candice Millard for writing such an enthralling review!  Thanks to Ms. Millard, self learned that the photographer Eadweard Muybridge liked to eat “cheese flies, tiny insects that hover around the tops of old cheese and that he used to gather up into packages and snack on as he brooded over his photographs.”  Fascinating, absolutely fascinating.
  • A couple of books about Christopher Marlowe, including:
  1. The Marlowe Papers, a biography of the dramatist written in verse, by Ros Barber (just published)
  2. Dead Man in Deptford, by Anthony Burgess (published 1993)
  3. Christoferus, by Robin Chapman (published 1993)
  4. Tamburlaine Must Die, by “Scottish thriller writer” Louise Welsh (2004)

Stay tuned, dear blog readers.  Stay tuned.

What Self Is Interested in Reading (After Perusing the NYTBR of 30 Dec 2012)

A disclaimer:  Self doesn’t read books that begin when the lead character is five (because nothing sticks in self’s memory before seven or so, so how can it be different for anyone else?)  She’s not interested in books recommended by Arnold Schwarzenegger (the By the Book interview).  She’s read three books by Oliver Sacks and that is quite enough (which is not to say the books weren’t good, only that self’s reading life is consumed by restlessness, an urge to discover new voices).  She doesn’t read memoirs about animals.  But she will read anything by Jose Saramago.  And any book about exploration.  And any book whose author has a Kafka-esque life story (She used to teach Kafka; fortunately, none of her students caught the slight tremolo that would creep into self’s voice when discussing “Metamorphosis”).  She eagerly reads debut short story collections (especially when they contain stories set somewhere unexpected, like a nursing home).

Without further ado, here are the reviewed books that self would like to read:

Stay tuned, dear blog readers.  Stay tuned.

NYTBR: Notable Fiction, 2012

The NYTBR of December 2 is the “100 Notable Books of 2012″ issue.  Impossible for self to go through the whole gamut, digesting for dear blog readers, so she will confine herself to culling through the Fiction.  And she picked 18 books from the 50 in the Fiction list that she feels MOST interested in perusing, for the following reasons:

She likes stories about hackers.  She likes stories set on rural communes.  She likes Sherman Alexie, especially when he’s being “moving and funny.”  She likes stories about parents who do idiotic things, like “rob a bank” (Self always ends up feeling almost saintly, by comparison).  She likes novels set in 2053.  Especially if they are set in Ireland.  She likes novels set in “shabby urban mental” hospitals.  She likes novels about “clerks, cooks and lawyers,” especially if they are found in “a forward operating base in Iraq.”  She likes novels about caregivers.  Especially if the caregivers are in California.  She usually disdains story collections about recurring characters, but not when they are tied together by “a desert rock formation.”  She likes novels that ask existential questions.  She’s never been on a Chesapeake Bay estate, so she is happy when a novel wants to take her there.  She’s never read a story set on the “desolate Channel Islands,” she is happy for the same reason she wants to read a Chesapeake Bay novel.  She likes “smart and nuanced” short story collections.  She likes stories about outsiders, especially when the outsider in question knows how to stir up trouble.  She likes novels that takes liberties with Biblical characters.  She has never read a novel with characters from Senegal, so she is ecstatic that she can finally get to read one.  She likes reading novels about families “torn apart” by war or by a cataclysmic natural event.  She likes war novels in general.

So here are self’s picks of the 50 Notable Fiction Books of 2012 recommended by the NYTBR:

  1. Alif the Unseen, by G. Willow Wilson
  2. Arcadia, by Lauren Groff
  3. Blasphemy, by Sherman Alexie
  4. Canada, by Richard Ford
  5. City of Bohane, by Kevin Barry
  6. The Devil in Silver, by Victor LaValle
  7. Fobbit, by David Abrams
  8. The Forgetting Tree, by Tatjana Soli
  9. Gods Without Men, by Hari Kunzru
  10. How Should a Person Be?  by Sheila Heti
  11. The Right-Hand Shore, by Christopher Tilghman
  12. San Miguel, by T. Coraghessan Boyle
  13. Shout Her Lovely Name, by Natalie Serber
  14. Swimming Home, by Deborah Levy
  15. The Testament of Mary, by Colm Toibin
  16. Three Strong Women, by Marie NDiaye
  17. Toby’s Room, by Pat Barker
  18. The Yellow Birds, by Kevin Powers

The only five authors self has read before are:  Sherman Alexie, Richard Ford, T. Coraghessan Boyle, Colm Toibin, and Pat Barker.  Of these five, self has seen three in person (Never mind which ones they are)

The author she wishes could think of better titles for his books is T. Coraghessan Boyle.  It occurs to her that she really hates titles like Three Strong Women, because if everyone went around naming the qualities of their major characters, the world might be full of titles like Two Thieving Men or Four Adulterous Women or Three Brave Widows or –  well, you get the picture.

Stay tuned, dear blog readers.  Stay tuned.

Blogging Odds & Ends (The End of the 2nd Sunday of December 2012)

Sometimes, self thinks the reason she blog so much (and enjoys it so hugely) is that it allows her to string together all the odd bits of knowledge that reside in her head.  That is, it lets her polish off each tiny scrap of knowledge, and string them together, and nothing of her experience(s) go to waste.  Because, no matter how insignificant, they all go into this blog.

Writing a blog is not therapy.  It’s a way she can share, can make her experiences “useful.”  Otherwise, she’d just be a batty old lady spending her days puttering about and reading.

Today, self is racking her brains about where to send a very long story.  As stories go, this is a relatively young one.  That is, she thinks she began writing it just two years ago (In contrast, some of her stories take as long as seven years, from start to finish.  This was actually the case with “Silence,” the only story of hers that ever got shortlisted for the O. Henry Literature Prize.  And, come to think of it, that story is exactly seven pages long.  Double-spaced.  With lots of white space separating the scenes.)

Her new story is almost 9,000 words, and most literary magazines have length limits, usually around 6,000 words.  But self’s story is too short to be considered a novella.  Thus, it exists in a twilight zone, somewhere between story and novella.

(But, self, why look a gift horse in the mouth?  Just be grateful you managed to write anything at all!)

Self pulls from her Pile of Stuff this evening an essay she clipped from The New York Times Book Review, several months ago.  It’s called “The Writer in the Family,” and it’s by Roger Rosenblatt.

Talking about how his writing is viewed by his family, he says “as far as anyone in the family can see, I do nothing or next to it.”  Which reminds self:  just a few days ago, Kathleen Burkhalter posted on Facebook that someone seemed to think she “did nothing,” and Kathleen (who is, by the way, a very good writer, who maintains a blog in the midst of a very very busy life AND pursued a Journalism degree from Harvard University and maintains ties with writers from all over) said “I work very, very hard at it.”

Rosenblatt goes on to say that usually the writer in the family is “a quiet child who dresses strangely and shows inclinations to do nothing in the future.”  Which is –  how did you know, oh Dear Roger?  That is exactly how self appears or appeared to her kith and kin.  With this further embellishment:  Now, everyone knows for sure she is crazy.  Who’d write four books for no money?  Only a crrraaaazy person!

The Man always tells self, with chagrin in his voice:  “I know you’ll be famous, but after you’re dead.”  Oh dear oh dear oh dear oh dear that is so so depressing.

Stay tuned, dear blog readers.  Stay tuned.

« Older entries

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 164 other followers