Quotes, First Monday of May (2013)

Is it the sixth of May already?  How can it be?  Is self dreaming?  Is she still in Venice?  Did she move to Trieste?

Self then gives herself a good shake and settles in to read reviews of last night’s “Game of Thrones.”

No, not last night’s “Game of Thrones,” because that one only had a teaser about Daenerys and some flying about of her loyal dragons.

Self is reading reviews of the episode before last night’s, the one with the hot tub scenes.

What?  Dear blog readers didn’t know that in medieval times, there was easy access to hot tubs?  Well, now you know.

In a nutshell, here is what happened the week before last to the mis-matched pair, Jaime Lannister (aka “Kingslayer”) and his captor/bodyguard, Brienne of Tarth.  (Who thinks up these names?  Definitely, not self!):

Jaime, recently gravely injured, joined his former captor during her bath and for the first time reveals why he infamously killed Mad King Aerys and earned the derogatory nickname “Kingslayer.” (James Hibberd of insidetv.ew.com)

  • “Gravely injured” means Jaime’s right hand was chopped off.
  • “Derogatory” does not seem to apply to the name “Kingslayer.” Not, at least, in self’s book.

Here’s another version of the same scene, this from the Vancouver Observer.  Yup, that’s right.  The Vancouver Observer.  Apparently, the Game of Thrones thing has spread even to Canada:

Brienne of Tarth is taking a bath.  Turns out there’s a woman under all that mud.  Jaime Lannister slinks in, says “Don’t mind if I do,” drops trou and walks towards Brienne’s tub.

There are apparently other hot tubs in the area, as Brienne, fierce woman warrior that she is, is about to vacate and go to another one.  Seems there’s a veritable spa in the castle where Jamie and Brienne are being held prisoner.

Jamie tells Brienne to stay, saying something like “Don’t worry, it’s just me.”  And then he tells her a story, which is the most boring story in the whole world, self doesn’t know why a man and woman sitting in a hut tub have to do exposition.  But finally, Jamie says something to Brienne that pisses her off and she gets up and stands to her full height.  And Jamie gulps and –  next thing you know, he falls in a dead faint (because he’s never seen a giantess naked before?) and Brienne has to hold him in her arms, calling for help for the Kingslayer.  At which point, the guy who we all thought had fainted mumbles:  “Jamie.  My name’s Jamie.”

TA-DA!

Last night’s episode, Brienne was dressed as a woman, and Jamie was trying to eat a steak with one hand and failing miserably, much to the sadistic enjoyment of their host, the Lord of the Castle.  Brienne reaches out a hand and sticks Jamie’s steak with her fork (Holy Metaphor!), and Jamie then resumes cutting his meat with some semblance of dignity.  There was some gratuitous hand-holding afterwards.

Note to male/female prisoners:  When in the clutches of enemy, never hold hands.  This only provides Captor with more sadistic ideas about how to get each of you so muddled you’ll do/say anything.

And now to the REAL quote of the day, which is from a story by Paul La Farge (“Another Life”) in The New Yorker of July 2, 2012.  Yup, self is really scraping the bottom of the barrel now, in her Humongous Pile of Stuff.

The story needs to be placed in context:  a long-married couple go to Boston to attend the wife’s father’s 60th birthday party.  The husband finds the whole idea tiresome, he’d rather hole up in his room with Rousseau’s “Discourse on the Origin of Inequality” :  “Nature commands every animal and the beast obeys,” Rousseau writes (Self can’t believe she’s never thought of Rousseau before, especially since she’s now completely hooked on Game of Thrones.)  At some point, the husband decides to continue reading Rousseau in the hotel bar, so he brings his book down with him:

The husband is not trying to pick anyone up.  His wife will be back in an hour or two, and besides who would dream of picking someone up with Rousseau?  Of all the authors you could try to pick someone up with, Rousseau is probably the worst.  Or maybe Kant.  The husband orders a hot toddy.  The bartender, an attractive young woman with crinkly black hair, brings him the drink and they exchange remarks about it.  Is that what you wanted?  Yes, it’s perfect, the husband says.  Good, I’m glad.  The bartender smiles.  The husband reads more Rousseau.  Upstairs, in his room, he was really understanding the Second Discourse, but down here at the bar he finds it hard to concentrate.

Stay tuned, dear blog readers.  Stay tuned.

Quo Vadis, Soderbergh?

There are many things about the David Denby article in The New Yorker of Feb. 11 and 18, 2013 that are worth quoting.

For one thing, it’s about Side Effects, a move self wants to see (The other new movies are A Good Day to Die Hard, which is supposedly terrible, Identity Thief, which is also supposedly terrible, and Safe Haven which self wouldn’t see even if it got rave reviews, which it didn’t)

Denby begins his review by saying that Steven Soderbergh “has made twenty-six feature films in twenty-four years, has just turned fifty . . .  and says that, after his new film, Side Effects he wants to leave movies behind in order, mostly, to paint.”

Self heard about the retirement announcement, nothing official, just trills on the Read the rest of this entry »

Best Movies, February 2013

Life of PiLife of PiLife of Pi.  (Self wants to see this one again, which hasn’t happened to her since Midnight in Paris)

Next:  Warm BodiesWarm BodiesWarm Bodies.

Next Next:  Silver Linings PlaybookSilver Linings PlaybookSilver Linings Playbook.

Yet to See:  Amour (Anthony Lane of The New Yorker says it has “a sense of foreboding” that is “clear and encompassing . . .  more so, in fact, because the only villain is time, and the only fault of the victims is to grow old.” Self saw Haneke’s earlier film, “The White Ribbon,” which drips with dread and community guilt and shame, so she can well imagine what a joyous two-hour romp in the theater she will have watching this.  Nevertheless . . .  )

Thinking more about Warm Bodies and that performance by Nicholas Hoult:  the only reason there is not more heat in the end is that –  gulp!  –  Teresa Palmer underplays her role to the point of (almost) vacuity.  If that had been Jennifer Lawrence . . .   Nevertheless, self loved the way Palmer wielded her shotgun in the early scenes.

SPOILER ALERT:

Next question:  Why is R seated by himself in the backseat, happily bleeding, while Julie and her father exchange loving glances, etc as if no one exists except each other?  Are the two not aware that there is a man bleeding in the back seat?

OK so R is happy he is bleeding because it means he can feel pain, and to feel anything is to be human.  I understand that part.  But doesn’t being human also mean being more concerned?  And, this is no ordinary person in the back seat, this is — R,  the hero of our story!  If a passerby can feel sympathy for M because his “zombie fingers” have difficulty opening an umbrella, what more the victim of a gunshot wound?  Who is bleeding all over the back seat?  Shouldn’t Juliet and her father at least be telling R to lie down, or keep pressure on the wound, or something of that sort?  Or is R still a zombie, and thus he can never die or bleed out?  Self finds all of this terribly confusing.

Stay tuned, dear blog readers.  Stay tuned.

Stream-of-Consciousness, Monday Before Thanksgiving (2012)

Costco!  Listerine Discount Coupon!  Turkey!  No Turkey!  Pumpkin Pie!  No Pumpkin Pie!  Glendale for two days? No Glendale for two days!  Son for Christmas!  NOT!  Pumpkin Pie!  No Pumpkin Pie!  Whole Foods Pumpkin Pie!  No, Pamplemousse Pumpkin-spiced Sponge Cake!  No, Pamplemousse Caramel Streusel Apple Tart!  Tree: real or fake? $200 for fake? That’s it: No tree!

Calls:  Margarita!  Irene in L.A.!  Venice!  March!  Floods!  Credit Card!  Venice!  No, Bacolod!  But, no handguns!  Girl, the black eye!  Remember the black eye?  Somnambulism!  Insomnia!  Black Eye!  Bacolod!  Champagne!  Martinelli’s Sparkling Cider!  Honeybaked Ham!  Marylee!  Turkey Day!  Merwin’s Poem About Airports!  Ingrid Wendt!  Venice!  Philadelphia!  Margarita again!

Lawyer!  No, no lawyer!  Enough with lawyers!  Think:  Family!  Think:  Good Thoughts!  No Lawyer means more money!  More money in the bank!  More money for Venice in 2013! And more money for pumpkin pie! And greeting cards!

And again, questions! So many questions!

    Why is there a big black umbrella in the trunk of self’s car? Who put it there, and when?
    Whose brass key is that in the trunk, nestled beneath the big, black umbrella? To what drawer or safe does this key belong?
    And why is Bella The Ancient One still content to live, when we give her no particular care, other than to wipe up her pee and administer twice a day Glucosamine and pain medication?

Nevertheless

    , isn’t it ungrateful (nay, even

un-Amerian

    to say that, when Bella has provided our family with so many years of unstinting and unquestioning devotion?

W. S. Merwin’s poem in the October 15, 2012 New Yorker (Self is mindful of the fact that the trunk of her car is still full of totally unnecessary purchases from Costco, all waiting to be off-loaded as soon as self finishes this post, but anyhoo) is such a hoot  Here’s the first half!

Neither Here Nor There

An airport is nowhere
which is not something
generally noticed

yet some unnamed person in the past
deliberately planned it
to be there

and you have spent time there
again
and are spending time there again

Stay tuned, dear blog readers. Stay tuned.

Books, Books, A Wealth of Books!

Books self wants to read after digging into her pile of stuff and finding:  a)  The New York Times Book Review of Sept. 23, 2012 and b) The New Yorker of Oct. 8, 2012:

  • This Is How You Lose Her, Junot Diaz’s new novel
  • Mary Poppins, by P. L. Travers
  • Dancing to the Precipice by Caroline Moorehead
  • Bring Up the Bodies, by Hilary Mantel
  • Wolf Hall by Hilary Mantel
  • A Strange Eventful History by Michael Holroyd
  • War and Peace (all three volumes)
  • Battleborn, a first story collection by Claire Vaye Watkins
  • Double Indemnity by James. M. Cain
  • The Postman Always Rings Twice by James M. Cain
  • Mildred Pierce by James M. Cain
  • Subversives, a history of J. Edgar Hoover’s snooping chicanery, by Seth Rosenfeld
  • The Revised Fundamentals of Caregiving, the third novel of Jonathan Evison
  • The Thing About Thugs, a novel about a “young man from an Indian village,” a spinner of tall tales in 19th century London, by Tabish Khair

Stay tuned, dear blog readers.  Stay tuned.

Anthony Lane, Ferocious as Usual

From Lane’s review of “Lawless,” in the Sept. 3, 2012 issue of The New Yorker:

I have struggled, through fifty-seven varieties of “Transformers,” to feel the magic of Shia LaBeouf, who has the expression of a panicking puppy and a name like an Islamic steak house.

From Lane’s review of “The Expendables 2″ (in the same issue of The New Yorker):

Anyone who soldiered through “The Expendables,” two years ago, will be touched, and a little surprised, to learn that there is more to expend.

Stay tuned, dear blog readers.  Stay tuned.

Jane Kramer, The New Yorker (23 July 2012)

From Personal History:  “A Reporter at Odds”

The fact remains that, given the choice between a vacation without a notebook and a revolution with one, most of us would pass on the yellow sundress or the cargo pants and buy a flak jacket.  The advantage is that I can pack in a half hour for any work trip, as long as I have a daily supply of pens, a stack of my favorite interview pads –  six by nine, lined, spiral on top –  and a couple of clean black turtlenecks and jeans.  But how do you pack for a vacation?  Who would willingly exchange license and anonymity for the role of gawker in a sundress?

I did.  For three weeks in January, I became a tourist.  No notebooks, no Bic twelve-packs.  No interviews at all –  an exercise in self-restraint triggered by the news that years of frequent-flier miles, racked up in the pursuit of stories, were going to expire in February.  After four days spent attempting communication with the “reward specialists” at a United phone bank near Mumbai, I managed to nail two round-trip reservations for Bangkok, which was as far as my miles would take us.  That settled, the question became:  What would I do for three weeks in Southeast Asia if I wasn’t working?  What would my husband, an anthropologist between semesters with his own notebook (spiral on the left), do?

Self is so glad to know that even Jane Kramer of The New Yorker experiences frequent flier discombobulation.  And to think self had the temerity to think, while on hold after placing her nth call to United Mileage Plus:  Is this really the best possible use of my life for the next four hours?

Here’s the deal, dear blog readers:  The reason self doesn’t have to teach so much, and the reason she flies here there and everywhere, is that she has come into her inheritance.  What a loaded word.  It is true.  Your dear blog mistress hit the Stakes-of-Life jackpot and decided to see if she could balance the quiet anonymity of Redwood City, California with the rest of the world.  Now life is such a dizzying mess that she gardens with rollers in her hair.  Seriously.  This morning, she spent an hour on her knees planting celosia in between the lamb’s ears.  When she finally straightened up to brush some stray bangs off her hot, sweaty forehead, she encountered the unmistakable feel of plastic.  Lest you think that self routinely walks around with her (short, and getting ever shorter) hair in curlers, let’s just say that today was a once-in-a-lifetime occurrence.  And when she tells cousins her stories, they always respond with, “IF that’s true . . . “

You think India and Claremont (California) and Bacolod and Scotland and Amsterdam and Paris were the extent of self’s travels for this year?  Ixnay!  There are at least three more trips on the horizon.  That means a whole mountain of adventures.  And more grumpiness from The Man.  But, c’est la vie, c’est la vie, c’est la vie . . .

The New Yorker Decides

Self thought it would be interesting to look back at a list featured in The New Yorker in 1999.

The list was called The Future of American Fiction.  Here are some of the writers who were on that list, with the books that put them “firmly in the firmament”:

  • Michael Chabon, The Mysteries of Pittsburgh
  • Junot Diaz, Drown
  • Jonathan Franzen, The Corrections
  • Jhumpa Lahiri, Interpreter of Maladies
  • David Foster Wallace, Infinite Jest

And now, here are the writers featured in The New Yorker’s 20 Under 40 (the June 2010 issue).  Since The New Yorker puts such a premium on youth (when did this happen?), they inform us that Téa Obreht is the youngest on the list (She was 24), and Chris Adrian the oldest (He was 39.  Wow, that’s practically antideluvian!).  And here are the authors with the exploding talent:

  • Lyrical Realists:  Nell Freudenberger, Philipp Meyer, C. E. Morgan, Salvatore Scibona (Of these names, self has read only Freudenberger)
  • Satirical Comedy:  Joshua Ferris, Gary Shteyngart (Self adores Ferris)
  • Genre-bending:  Jonathan Safran Foer, Nicole Krauss, Téa Obreht (Self has read Obreht and likes –  no, admires –  her exceedingly)
  • “Clear-eyed portraitists of immigration and indentity” :  David Bezmozgis, Dinaw Mengetsu (Never read either)
  • Idiosyncratic, voice-driven:  Sarah Shun-lien Bynum, ZZ Packer, Wells Tower (Read all, loved two)
  • “Haunting, socio-political” :  Chimamande Ngozi Adichie, Daniel Alarcon, Yiyun Li (Read Adichie)
  • “Metaphysical fantasies” : Chris Adrian, Rivka Galchen, Karen Russell (Self strikes out in this category)

In introducing the list, The New Yorker editors assert:  “. . .  the lure of the list is deeply ingrained.  The Ten Commandments, the twelve disciples, the seven deadly sins, the Fantastic Four –  they have the appeal of the countable and the contained, even if we suspect that there may have been other, equally compelling commandments, disciples, sins, and superheroes.”

Dave Eggers and Colson Whitehead didn’t make the 2010 list because they were “on the wrong side of our birthday cutoff.”  Oh, poor Dave and Colson –  not because they didn’t make the list, but because everyone now has an idea of how old they are.  And you know, don’t let anyone tell you different:  Writing is a vicious business, and the writer will need every advantage and every trick in the book, and most of the time that isn’t even enough.

Stay tuned, dear blog reader.  Stay tuned.

Summer of 2012 in Movies

The first movie self saw after getting back from her oh-so-intellectual June in southern Scotland was “Magic Mike.”  Since she’d read the reviews of this movie in The Guardian and The Times, she was naturally all agog to see this film’s representation of American male hot-ness as embodied by McConnaughey, Tatum, and Pettyfer.  Especially since the representation was being delivered by a director like Steven Soderbergh who, self is sure we can all agree, is a recognized authority on tasteful marketing of hot-ness (Exhibit A:  Ocean’s Eleven.  Exhibit B:  Ocean’s Twelve).  And it did not disappoint!  Self’s jaw dropped as she was watching!  She even wanted to go back and see it again, but was unfortunately derailed by homely chores like straightening up the house and watering her garden and doing laundry and cooking fine, delicious dinners for The Man.

Self saw “Total Recall” and liked it.  Naturally, Colin Farrell is a big, big improvement over Arnold.  And Kate Beckinsale –  how self loves this actress’s incarnation into kick-ass.  Time was, a long loooong time ago, when Kate used to play the Plain Jane in Jane Austen movie adaptations.  At least, she did in one movie self saw.  This was, of course, pre “Pearl Harbor.”

Self also saw:  “Beasts of the Southern Wild” (Excellent) and “Moonrise Kingdom” (Excellent to the nth)

Then there were those three Filipino films she saw at the Edinburgh International Film Festival (end of June) which she still hasn’t found time to discuss –  hopefully, things will calm down enough for her to pour her heart out.

She really liked “Dark Knight Rises.”  She even got to like Anne Hathaway as Catwoman.  And can’t imagine what a Ryan Reynolds Batman will be like.

She still hasn’t seen “Expendables 2″ or “The Campaign” but hopefully will, soon.  And she really wants to see the movie with “Ruby” in the title.

But now she will reflect on Bourne.  The reason for this is that she has been perusing the August 13 & 20, 2012 of The New Yorker (a double issue:  it’s pretty thin, for a double issue), and has read the David Denby review of “The Bourne Legacy.”

When the movie began, self kept imagining Matt Damon playing the lead.  He has a completely different type of face from Jeremy Renner –  more lean, and more ordinary, but also more compelling.  But self liked Rachel Weisz in the role of female sidekick –  she never quite got over the demise of Marie in Bourne 2, and then she was slightly hopeful for Julia Stiles at the end of Bourne 3, but look where that got her.

The best, the absolutely most tension-filled scene in “The Bourne Legacy” is one that no reviewer has yet seen fit to discuss:  and that is the scene where Renner comes over a snowy mountain and encounters a sad-eyed, laconic man living all by his lonesome in a cabin, and they have quite an extended conversation, during every second of which self would turn to The Man with eyebrows raised and hiss:  “He’s gonna pop him now!  Now!”  The solitary man is so out of it that he attempts to read a book after dinner.  No self-respecting spy worth his salt would let a man read a book when he is available for questioning.  But apparently solitary man does not slip so easily into the verbal game thing, for his response is to close the book, stand up, and leave the scene.  Whereupon –  self kept expecting him NOT to show up the next morning, but he showed up.  Then she thought he would NOT show up after cooking breakfast, but again he was there.  Then she thought he would surely try to off Renner when Renner goes somewhere — maybe behind the woodshed, where some very scary meds are being stored in a super-secret freezer — but again, he is there.  There is just no getting rid of this man and his mournful presence!

Here’s self’s favorite section of the Denby review:

In an age of movie magic, the “Bourne” series, even at its most accelerated, stuck to grounded action.  Gravity mattered in all three films; stunt men, falling earthward, were more central than pixels.

Hear, hear!

In addition, Denby says that “The Bourne Legacy” can boast of having “the longest motorcycle chase in the history of wheels.”  But why stop there, David?  It is also, in self’s humble opinion, the BEST long motorcycle chase in the history of wheels.  In no small part because that chase scene takes place on location in Manila.  And, jeez, anyone who’s seen the chaos of a Manila street would know how hard it is to thread anyone through it, much less movie stars like Jeremy Renner and Edward Norton and Rachel Weisz!  That is a singular achievement in and of itself!

Stay tuned, dear blog readers.  Stay tuned.

A Richard Brody Review of “Christmas Holiday” (1944)

From The New Yorker of 6 August 2012 (“Critic’s Notebook”):

Deanna Durbin was one of Hollywood’s most popular actresses before she retired, in 1949, at the age of twenty-eight.  Her apparent unease with performance folds poignantly into her starring role in “Christmas Holiday,” Robert Siodmak’s film noir of romantic degradation, from 1944.  She plays a singer/ prostitute in a sleazy New Orleans dance hall who takes the stage with her arms pinned limply to her sides and her eyes asking in despair, “What am I doing here?”  The rest of the movie, told largely in flashbacks, provides the reason:  fallout from her marriage to a fast-talking, glad-handing heel (played with unctuous charm by Gene Kelly).  Siodmak makes performance his subject, with scenes of an orchestra playing Wagner and Beethoven, lovers singing at a piano in a parlor, and a society band at a swank café, where, in a cunning crane shot of a saunter down a staircase –  with Kelly’s leonine grace and Durbin’s homely footfalls –  he condenses the drama to a thwarted dance.

Dear blog readers, self thinks this is the first time she’s ever heard of Gene Kelly playing the role of a less-than-totally-nice guy.  Shows you how little she knows.

Stay tuned, dear blog readers.  Stay tuned.

« Older entries

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 131 other followers